A Leader’s Guide to Training for the ACFT: Part 2

1000x563_q95.jpg

By Tyler Inman

In Part 1, you learned that overload must occur to increase fitness.  Overload drives adaptation by creating enough stress to elicit a response. The key is a slow, smooth progression commonly referred to as progressive overload.  Part 2 will describe both the types of movements we should overload and the appropriate prescription to train each component of fitness.

Underlying Theory 2: Specific Adaptation to Imposed Demands (SAID Principle)

The body’s optimal response to stress is to increase the resistance to the initial stress so that we are more prepared the next time we face it.  This favorable adaptation is specific to the stimulus.  In other words, the training effect correlates directly to the type of training. Great endurance runners typically train using some combination of long-distance, aerobic training.  Their physiology is fine-tuned for aerobic endurance work in the modality of running.  Great endurance runners, despite good, hard training, are probably not great long jumpers because they do not frequently train in the power domain.  Likewise, despite a great aerobic engine, they may not be great long distance swimmers because they do not train frequently in the swim modality.

This brings to light two key applications of the SAID principle:  We must train specifically for the types of movements we intend to perform (the movement modality) and for the specific component of fitness we desire to exhibit (the fitness component or domain).

 Application 2a: Types of Movements

Unlike the APFT, the ACFT requires more than just flexion of the trunk during the sit-up and the ability to run in a straight line.  The ACFT actually requires Soldiers to move through multiple planes using a variety of movement patterns.  In training to perform well on the ACFT, Soldiers now have the opportunity to train like an athlete – the same type of training that will serve them well on the battlefield.  There are six key movement patterns Soldiers should train specifically to improve performance: hinge, squat, push, pull, rotate, and lunge.  When combined with training in a variety of modalities (running, jumping, dragging, carrying, change of direction), deliberately training each of the aforementioned movement patterns (especially under load) will significantly improve Soldier performance on the ACFT.

FIgure4-Precise6.png
Figure 4 – Precise Pattern 6

Application 2b: Domains of Fitness

Not only does the ACFT require new and different movement patterns, but it also requires more capacity in the muscular strength and anaerobic endurance domains.  Capacity in each of the domains of fitness — muscular strength, muscular endurance, anaerobic endurance, and aerobic endurance (only 2 of which are tested via APFT) — are the result of very different physiological characteristics and adaptations.  Accordingly, the different domains of fitness are effectively trained and improved via different means.   For example, lifting light weights for high repetitions may improve muscular endurance, but it does not contribute to building strength.  Strength, defined as the capacity to exert force against maximal resistance, is best developed by lifting relatively heavy loads for fewer repetitions.  This brings to light the second application of the SAID principle.  In order to improve performance in each of the fitness domains, one must train under the specific conditions known to develop a given domain.  The following chart outlines the appropriate intensity and volume for training each of the domains of fitness.

Figure5-FitDomains.JPG
Figure 5 – How to train each component of fitness adapted from the ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription

The SAID principle directs the application of progressive overload.  It helps us understand exactly where and how we should overload the body to drive the desired adaptation.

Part 3 will further expand on these ideas to describe the when aspect of training. When should we program a change in variables?  When should we change the type of training?  When are we most prepared to meet mission demands?

CPT Tyler Inman is an Army Infantry officer and current instructor in the West Point Department of Physical Education. He has a Masters in Kinesiology and is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS) and Tactical Strength and Conditioning Facilitator (TSAC-F) through the NSCA.  He’s passionate about physical readiness training, leader development, and getting better everyday.  His website, Training For 600, is dedicated to providing Army leaders with actionable tools, techniques, and strategies for improving performance.  You can connect with Tyler on Facebook: @TF600acft, Twitter: @TrainingFor600

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.