Lead with the best version of yourself.

Throwing Your Boots Over the Wire


By: Steve Leonard

There comes a time when we all throw our boots over the wire. It’s a time of reflection on the past and a time of anticipation for what’s yet to come. It’s an opportunity to share lessons learned, to look back on the kernels of wisdom that come with years of service. It’s one last chance to offer a little mentoring for those who can’t yet see their career horizons. So, it was with some degree of anticipation that I hovered over a post on From the Green Notebook from Army Lieutenant Colonel Dominick “Dom” Edwards, entitled “31 Things Your Senior Rater Would Like You to Know That He Probably Won’t Tell you.” I’ve been there, he’s rapidly approaching that point, and many more of you will be there one day, too.

As I prepared to throw my own boots over the wire, much of my reflection paralleled that of Dom Edwards, almost a collection of pieces of advice I would have offered myself when I pinned on my gold bars 28 years earlier. My own emphasis focused in on your personal reputation as a leader, the brand you inherently promote, whether or not you realize it. Edwards captured many of the same thoughts, and admittedly zeroed in on some of his own personal idiosyncrasies. Ultimately, this is about mentoring. If you’re doing your job as a leader, then you ought to be sharing as much of that accrued knowledge and wisdom as humanly possible.

Edwards’ post, however, generated a fair amount of negative comments and sparked an unusually heated debate. My own reaction was mixed. While on one hand I appreciate the need for a leader to be literate, fair, and insightful, I was taken aback by suggestions that someone would be judging my choice of spouse or the social graces of my children, or that someone might think that bullion rank was somehow a necessity. Everyone has idiosyncrasies, and these are no doubt high on Edwards’ list. I have my own and am convinced that if I allowed them to bleed into the public discourse people would think I was “one off.” But that’s a conversation for another day.

Leader Identity

What Edwards is really addressing is the concept of your personal leader brand. His post focuses on a few “unspoken” aspects of your brand that often need attention, but are not often discussed between senior rater and subordinate. But they should be. The problem with unspoken norms, as he describes them, is that they represent a significant portion of your brand as a leader. They cannot remain unspoken. You don’t have to be a mentor to someone to share expectations with them, you just have to be a good leader. And those expectations have to be both spoken and reinforced.

Your leader brand is a reflection of you as a total leader. It’s your identity, as viewed through the eyes of those around you. Is there a social component to it? Clearly. Does your family play a role in your brand? You’d better believe it. If you marry a stripper – male or female – or your kids burn golf carts on the green of the 11th hole on the post golf course, we’ll have some awkward moments. But no more so than if you don’t meet height and weight standards or can’t string two sentences together in a report. I don’t care if you wear bullion rank or not, but make damn sure that you’re in the designated uniform when the situation calls for it and that you wear that uniform with pride.*

Much of what we do is about building teams, where social events play a major role. However, there are reasons why people opt not to participate in social events. Leaders that allow their organizations to become overly cliquish bear a significant responsibility for the social climate. Spouses that socially ostracize other spouses also contribute to the challenge of team building. As leaders, it’s incumbent upon us to know why people avoid social events before leveling judgment against them. It may be a blinding flash of the obvious, but ‘socially awkward’ is the norm for many events; the key to success is making everyone feel comfortable and welcome, regardless of the awkwardness of the event. Thank You notes are old school, but classy. That said, if you and all of your subordinates send me Thank You notes after visiting my house, I will probably think you have a long stick up your ass, however polite a gesture that may be.

Should you choose your spouse carefully? Sure, that’s solid advice for anyone.** Should you raise your children to respect and communicate with adults? That’s pretty much universal. How much should your spouse be involved in your profession? That really depends on him or her, but it’s a good idea to weigh the organizational climate before your spouse schedules an office call with the commander to discuss what should be on the training schedule.*** It’s common today for both spouses to work, and even for them both to be in uniform. It’s easy for someone to tell you that your spouse has a designated place of duty after hours, but that doesn’t always sell so well on the homefront. And good luck telling your spouse that it’s “okay if you work.”

The problem with unspoken norms is just that. They’re unspoken. Unspoken norms, while not uncommon, lead to misinterpretation, misunderstanding, and mistakes. If it’s a norm, it should be well understood by all and not at all left to guesswork. Because when we leave organizational norms to guesswork, we’re left with the Seinfeld episode in which George is fired for having sex with the cleaning lady on his desk: “Was that wrong?”

In the end, this entire discussion comes down to transparency, mentoring, and an individual’s recognition of their own leader brand. As leaders, we bear a great responsibility in developing and maturing our subordinate leaders. No aspect of that process should be unspoken or left to chance. If we truly believe that we are charged with growing the next generation of our nation’s leaders, then we need to take that task to heart and ensure that we commit ourselves to see it through to the bitter end. And if you still show up to the Dining In in board shorts and flip flops with a rabid dog and three kids, then we’ll have a different conversation on Monday morning.

* To this day, I still feel a little guilty for once telling someone that a formal Dining Out was actually a costume-themed party. He and his spouse arrived as Little Bo Peep and her lost sheep. Hilarity ensued, as did weeks of retribution.

** Marrying a stripper is not unheard of, nor is marrying a soldier from your platoon. Neither of which, however, are generally considered “good choices.” Yes, who you choose for a spouse says a lot about who you are, but how you live your life and raise your family says much more.

*** True story. You can’t make up stuff that good.

Steve Leonard is a retired U.S. Army strategist and the creative force behind Doctrine Man!! A career writer and speaker with a passion for developing and mentoring the next generation of thinking leaders, he is a founding member of the Military Writers Guild and a regular contributor to the Atlantic Council’s Art of Future Warfare Project. Published extensively, Steve’s writing focuses on issues of foreign policy, national security, strategy and planning, leadership and leader development, military history, and, on occasion, fiction. An alumnus of the School of Advanced Military Studies, he led the writing team for the 2008 edition of the Army’s capstone manual, FM 3-0, and the interagency team that authored the U.S. Army’s first stability operations doctrine. He is the author/artist of four other books and is currently developing a graphic novel that will debut in December 2016. Follow his writing on The Strategy Bridge or his personal blog, The Pendulum, and on Twitter at @Doctrine_Man

5 thoughts on “Throwing Your Boots Over the Wire”

  1. Steve – Thank you for responding with sanity and clarity. I fully support everything I wrote; however, there have been some unfortunate misunderstandings posted on the thread on your page – partially due to poor wording on my part in some sections of the essay. The discussion I’ve observed all day in many places has been interesting and very different. I have received many public and private notes of support, even thanks, from people across the Army, including many who I was fortunate enough to lead. I have also seen some disagreement with what I wrote. I would like to offer some clarifying points, even though I acknowledge that many people will not openly consider what I say at this point.

    First, my true intent was to let people know that the SR has very limited time and opportunity to spend enough time with everyone in the unit, despite his or her desire to do so. The best leaders I’ve seen are masters of getting the Boss to know them in those limited interactions – something that I am not good at. I have also learned that the entire unit benefits when the leader does these things. So, I tried to share some things that make a difference and help the SR. Some of these are things that I was coached and mentored to do (purchase bullion rank), some are things that I saw peers do, others are things that my subordinates did and I appreciated.

    I have never judged or rated an officer because of his or her Family. That is against regulations and I would never do that. However, interaction with the Families was fun and gave me great insight about my Soldiers and Leaders. For example, when I was freed from banishment in the basement during a coffee (we’ve all been there) and met the 3-4 spouses who were helping clean up and they would talk about how their husband did something very considerate I learned that he was committed to the relationship and that gave me insight into his character. When I observed children at my home and I saw how they were dressed and cared for and behaved, then I learned about the sort of parents my leaders were.

    The social functions are important for many reasons and we know about esprit, tradition, etc. I also found they helped me learn about the “whole person” who was serving in our unit. That sort of insight is very important when you have to send only one platoon to the middle of a foreign nation on an SFA mission. It’s important when that officer or NCO recommends punishment during an article 15 or when they recommend a Soldier for a school. Learning about our Soldiers and their Families is our duty – recently dubbed “Engaged Leadership.” I’d like to think that I modeled this for my subordinates.

    The final misunderstanding is that I only cared about these sorts of things to the exclusion of discipline, fitness, tactical competence, and caring for Soldiers. Nothing is further from the truth. A lieutenant who could not qualify his tank was not allowed to lead a platoon, officers who failed APFTs were removed from leadership roles. What the 31 items on that list reflect are the small details and “finishing touches” that separate two tactically equal officers.

    The hard truth about our profession is the cuts get tougher as we become more senior. At some point the small things add up. The fine shades begin to matter when determining which of the 6 commanders in a BCT are most qualified for BCT command. The guys who realize this early and internalize the nuances and unspoken norms of our profession are in a better position to help their Soldiers and their units, which is what this profession is really all about. They then progress to greater responsibility and wind up helping more Soldiers.

    – Dom Edwards

  2. Sir,

    Thanks for your insight and willingness to share some thoughts from your foxhole. While you acknowledge some poor wording/phrases, your overall points are extremely valid. If *most* of the people providing negative feedback had put a little more critical thought into it, they would have come away with your overall point. Alas, that is not how the majority of the internet works, and most latched onto 1 or 2 points that made them surprisingly “angry”.

    I took away three overarching themes. These are all are intertwined, but they have nuanced differences.

    1) Buy-in to the Army and your unit. Some things have changed, or are not emphasized as much (Ex: Dress Mess), but social functions are still important, and leaders should make them a priority. If there are themes, buy-in. Someone planned that event. Someone spent money on that event. And if you are a leader, you will do the same one day. Be reciprocal with your time. As much as that LT loves his PLT, that Battalion Commander loves his Battalion. This isn’t brown-nosing. It’s supporting your unit, and your boss. That’s not wrong.

    2) Have pride in yourself. How you dress, matters. How you present yourself in public, matters. How your family presents itself in any setting, matters. Knowing your Soldiers and their character should be a point of pride. Thank you notes are a chance to show penmanship and manners–be proud of that.

    3) Your decision making is not just confined to the duty day. How your family acts, IS a reflection of you (and people can tell a difference in one bad apple of a kid, and a family of tyrants). How you, and they, behave in public is a reflection of your decision making, and what you may (or may not) be passing along to the Soldiers. Getting your spouse involved can help them understand the Army a little better, and may make them more amenable to supporting you more in the long run–as opposed as “getting out bc it was best for my family”.

    There are always special cases, and personal stories, and everyone has an opinion. None of this can ever be exact. But, your list is a valuable starting point to at least allow Junior Officers to think about, and let them conclude if they agree or disagree.

    And, honestly, there were plenty of negative comments in regard to “that’s why I got out”. Maybe that was a good thing. Maybe it wasn’t. But this list is not confined to the Army–and it takes experience, age, and a career to understand that.

    Thanks again.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.